Is Cloud Browser Automation Now Better Than Traditional Scraping?
November 3, 2025When AI Gets Creative: The Hilarious Side of Machine Learning
November 3, 2025A Real-World Example: The Socrates Problem
Have you ever played a game where you have to figure out a pattern or solve a puzzle by trying different combinations? That is similar to what deductive reasoning is about. Deduction means starting from general rules and deriving specific conclusions. But AI models, like Claude, sometimes struggle with this because they are not designed to reason step-by-step like a human does. Instead, they excel at generating possibilities and checking constraints. So, if we change the problem from “solve this deduction” to “generate many possibilities and then check which ones fit the rules”, we can get better results. This is like having a friend who is great at listing ideas but needs you to tell them which ideas make sense. By reframing the problem, we can use AI more effectively.
In an example, someone was trying to reconstruct a state based on certain rules, but Claude could not deduce the solution directly. However, by changing the approach, we can use Claude to generate many possible sequences of actions or states and then check which ones follow the rules. For instance, if you want to know what happens after several actions, you can ask Claude to list all possible outcomes and then check each one against the rules. This way, the AI does what it does best generating options, and you handle the logical checks. This method turns a deduction problem into a search and filter task, which is more manageable for AI.
- Generate many possibilities
- Check each one against the rules
- Keep only those that meet all conditions
Consider the classic example: “All humans are mortal. Socrates is human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.” If you ask an AI to deduce this, it might fail because it is not reasoning step-by-step. But if you ask it to generate properties of Socrates and then check which properties fit the rule “if human then mortal”, it works perfectly. Here is how: First, ask the AI to list properties of Socrates. It might generate “mortal, Greek, philosopher, etc.”. Then, you apply the rule by checking if “human” is in the list and if so, then “mortal” must be inferred. But note: the AI did not deduce; it generated a list, and you applied the rule. This hybrid approach combines generation and rule application, making it effective.
This approach is powerful because it uses the AI for what it is good at: exploring possibilities. Then, by applying simple rules or checks, we solve the deduction part. This is like having a brainstorming session where someone throws out ideas, and you pick the best ones. In programming, this is similar to writing a test that generates many cases and then checks for errors. For complex problems like state reconstruction, this method can save hours of manual work. Always remember: when deduction is needed, try turning it into a search problem with clear rules.
